Is The Enemy The Man In The White House? Or The Complacency Of Our Society?


constitution-with-franklin-quote-2-e1336601643130“Well what have we got, a republic or a monarchy”? As American citizens watch as their democratic system rips itself apart, while the majority appears to be remaining silent, seemingly unaware and disinterested, we must understand that this question has already been answered some 227 years ago. 

This complacency is what Benjamin Franklin warned us about during the creation of the constitution. As Franklin was approached by a woman who questioned what type of government the Framers had formed, Franklin responded, “A Republic, Madam, if you can keep it”. Given the warning of Franklin’s statement, we must ask ourselves this: Are we defending the Republic that was created by our founding fathers?

I happen to believe we are not because our nation has become a nation of enablers. Jonathan Turley, a constitutional scholar, alluded to this notion of a complicit America on wednesday. “We are turning a blind eye to a fundamental change in our system…and many will come to loathe that they remained silent during this period”. What did Turley mean by this period? Well, it is the period in our nations history where the more complicit we become, the more power our President retains. As the nation fixates on Obama’s latest example of lawlessness, we seem to become alarmed only after the fact of what he has already done.

The failure is our reactions to Obama’s actions. Silence and unawareness of the everyday American mixed with suppression of opposition is the oxygen that continues to feed Obamas fire. As he claims the right to rewrite, ignore and negate federal laws, only one group of Americans remain steadfast in their opposition, the Tea Party.

They are hated and berated by those within their party. They are demonized and marginalized by establishment politicians and Obama’s adminstration. They are criticized and vilified by the mainstream media. Seen as radicals for their beliefs and morons for their opinions. In the outright suppression of their voice and hatred of their beliefs, ons is left with what we would define as an authoritarian state’s response.

And this is why, today, I proudly declare myself apart of the Tea Party. It is because of their strong opposition in the face of an authoritarian on the verge, Barack Obama. So even if we lose this fight in the end I’ll stand proud knowing that I was not silent and I was not complicit during Obama’s fundamental change of America.

And at the end of the day my belief in my country is not radical, for a “Republic if you can keep it” is what I intend to do.


  1. Your point is well taken, about the need for all of us to be involved in defense of our liberty and its foundation documents, the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. In doing so, we must not and cannot absolve the President and his clique of their efforts to undermine the Constitution and our freedoms.

    1. I appreciate it wayne. It’s interesting to note how Jonathan Turley and other constitutional scholars this week have noted at how dangerous the concentration of power is becoming. Turley admits he’s a staunch supporter of Obama, yet he doesn’t let his ideology mask the constitution. Why can’t all liberals see this? Actually, why can’t they even acknowledge this? I guess it’s what happens when the principle of the law is brushed aside for an ideology, scary stuff.

      1. As I read elsewhere, a Portuguese Member of the European Parliament brushed aside objections that some of the recent European financial expedients were in violation of the law, by saying that the legislation should not get in the way of the facts on the ground–in other words, don’t let the law get in the way of what you want to do. That only works when you are in power and possess all wisdom, but when you cannot protection yourself from other majorities or from your own foolishness, breaking down the law may not be such a good idea.

      2. That example of a Portuguese Member brushing aside objections sounds like Pelosi pushing obamacare. We need to pass it to see what’s inside of it, we need to break laws to make sure it works, we need more money to help it roll out, we need etc. The justification is different but the intent remains the same, break one law to justify another and you open the flood gates to lawlessness.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s